Trade Agreement China Eu

Fact sheets, Vietnamese trade in your city, texts of agreements, exporters Stories The European Council and China`s diplomatic representation to the European Union announced on Monday the signing of a bilateral trade agreement on «geographic indications» between the two megamarkets, which deals with the protection of intellectual property of products of particular geographical origin. Germany has a very strong focus on the investment contract with China. This will be part of Merkel`s political legacy and will serve as the basis for a free trade agreement in the future. This point seems very distant indeed. The EU and China are discussing a series of dialogues on trade and investment issues: at the same time, the agreement came when US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo arrived in the UK to push London to toughen its stance towards China. As snub for the British government, Pompeo deliberately met with anti-Chinese MPs to discuss a point against Prime Minister Boris Johnson, a meeting described as «tougher» by the BBC. The fourth EU Implementation Report (other languages), published in November 2020 and preceded by the preface by DG Commerce Director-General Sabine Weyand (other languages), provides an overview of the results achieved in 2019 and the remarkable work for the EU`s 36 main preferential trade agreements. The accompanying staff working document provides detailed information in accordance with the trade agreement and trading partners. Of course, there are disagreements and disagreements, but there is also sobriety and realism. The EU remains convinced that it can defend its values and defend its values while maintaining a principle of commitment and cooperation with China, instead of pursuing the unfettered mantra of neo-cold and mcCarthyist politics. The EU is in favour of opening trade relations with China. However, the EU wants China to act fairly, respect intellectual property rights and meet its obligations as a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO).

As a result, the trade agreement between the EU and China and the companies of Pompeo in London show two very different geopolitical paths, one is reasonable, the other is suicidal. Prior to the meeting, it had been reported that European leaders were dissatisfied with the Xinjiang «re-education camps» and the brutal repression of Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang, the national security law in Hong Kong and the repression of freedom in that country, persistent trade imbalances and the lack of reciprocity for European businesses. As Europe and China make economic progress, the UK has managed to move away from these two huge markets and is left to the Trump administration. Given that the EU-China agreement defends the country of origin protocol, the White House is asking Britain to withdraw it in order to reduce its food standards and flood its agricultural markets with poor quality chicken. Britain has adopted a dogmatic foreign policy, while Europe has pursued a pragmatic policy. The contrast couldn`t be greater. The EU has commissioned studies to keep negotiators informed of the current trade picture, including Beijing`s willingness to compromise. The new agreement comes at an important time to symbolize confidence, content and progress in the development of trade negotiations, market access and investment between the two sides. Full approval, exports to EU regions, fact sheets, assistance to exporters There is a dispute over textile imports into the EU (bra wars) where European industries lose in Europe against cheaper Chinese imported products. The EU and China have finally reached an agreement to end the «textile conflict» that has poisoned their relations for several weeks.